I know in class today we talked about making lighting cues so that the audience doesn't really notice that the designer is making the cue; in other words, no one should really notice the lighting design of a show. It's kind of a silly thing to me though, not getting recognition for doing so much. Yet, it makes sense in the big scheme of things. Nonetheless, I'm pretty sure this class has brainwashed me into noticing everything and anything having to do with light, so now wherever I go and happen to see a Source 4 I get giddy...great.
Anyway, tonight I went to see the Philharmonic Society of Orange County present a "Musical Journey through China." Essentially, it was the presentation of classic and traditional Chinese music through song, instrument, and puppetry. While the goal of the performance was to showcase the true Chinese culture, I couldn't help but notice that the only light was a few basic floods coming straight down from the Lekos. There were only about 6 lights in use, and each of them just dropped pools of highly intense light on the stage and lit up the musicians. I know that the focus of the show was not to use cool lighting effects but to instead represent a more natural state yet I was still upset that, after seeing our light frenzy in class today, they didn't produce anything a little more spectacular.
So I guess the lesson to learn here is: sometimes it is O.K to use simple and straight-forward lighting. I was blinded by my excitement in the many ways that light can convey mood. Tonight I realized that sticking with simple lighting is still effective, especially to a particular genre of theatre.